header-logo header-logo

Children at risk

22 May 2008
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

News

Vulnerable children may be disenfranchised from the legal process because of reductions in funding for barristers in family law cases, the Bar Council has warned. The Legal Services Commission (LSC) has said in a private briefing that it is planning a 15% reduction in funding for legal representation in publicly funded family cases. Chair of the Family Law Bar Association, Lucy Theis QC, accused the LSC of putting increasing pressure on the family law system: “It should come as no surprise that the LSC hasn’t got the courage publicly to announce this latest assault on legal aid…The expertise of the barristers who practise in this area of the law is relied upon by both the litigants and the judges. Further cuts will not only reduce those who are willing to undertake this important work but also discourage those from wanting to specialise in this area,” she says.

Issue: 7322 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll