header-logo header-logo

24 April 2014 / David White
Categories: Features , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

A chilling effect?

David White reflects on the decision of the Supreme Court in Kennedy v Charity Commission

Judgment has recently been handed down by the Supreme Court in Kennedy v Charity Commission [2014] UKSC 20, [2014] All ER (D) 240 (Mar) and its decision to dismiss Kennedy’s appeal will make welcome news for many public authorities. 

The facts

Kennedy, a journalist for The Times newspaper, had requested information held by the Charity Commission to investigate three inquiries it had conducted in relation to the Mariam Appeal. The Mariam Appeal was launched in 1998 by MP George Galloway following the imposition by the UN of sanctions against Iraq. In 2003, allegations were made that improper donations had become funds of the Appeal which prompted the Charity Commission to carry out three inquiries. 

The request for information was made under s 1(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000) which grants individuals a general right to request information held by public authorities. The Charity Commission, as a public authority, is obliged to fulfil any requests for information

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll