header-logo header-logo

24 April 2014 / David White
Categories: Features , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

A chilling effect?

David White reflects on the decision of the Supreme Court in Kennedy v Charity Commission

Judgment has recently been handed down by the Supreme Court in Kennedy v Charity Commission [2014] UKSC 20, [2014] All ER (D) 240 (Mar) and its decision to dismiss Kennedy’s appeal will make welcome news for many public authorities. 

The facts

Kennedy, a journalist for The Times newspaper, had requested information held by the Charity Commission to investigate three inquiries it had conducted in relation to the Mariam Appeal. The Mariam Appeal was launched in 1998 by MP George Galloway following the imposition by the UN of sanctions against Iraq. In 2003, allegations were made that improper donations had become funds of the Appeal which prompted the Charity Commission to carry out three inquiries. 

The request for information was made under s 1(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FIA 2000) which grants individuals a general right to request information held by public authorities. The Charity Commission, as a public authority, is obliged to fulfil any requests for information

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll