header-logo header-logo

10 October 2025 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 8134 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Christine Keeler: In pursuit of truth

231869
Jon Robins reports on a petition to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler

Earlier this year, the son of the woman at the centre of the country’s most infamous sex scandal—the Profumo affair—handed in a petition to the Ministry of Justice, calling on the Lord Chancellor to recommend that the king exercise his royal prerogative of mercy.

Christine Keeler was jailed for nine months in 1963 for giving misleading information in court and obstructing the course of justice, in a case in which she was the victim of violence and her attacker (and her stalker) actually admitted the violence.

In May, Seymour Platt, Keeler’s son, together with her granddaughter and legal team, including the human rights barrister Felicity Gerry KC, handed in the petition together with a 300-page dossier.

Historic discrimination against women

According to Gerry, Keeler’s 1963 conviction for perjury was the ‘ultimate in slut-shaming’ and her posthumous exoneration would be an overdue opportunity to acknowledge historic discrimination against women in the justice system.

The writer Rebecca West captured

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll