header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
10 October 2025 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 8134 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Christine Keeler: In pursuit of truth

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
231869
Jon Robins reports on a petition to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler

Earlier this year, the son of the woman at the centre of the country’s most infamous sex scandal—the Profumo affair—handed in a petition to the Ministry of Justice, calling on the Lord Chancellor to recommend that the king exercise his royal prerogative of mercy.

Christine Keeler was jailed for nine months in 1963 for giving misleading information in court and obstructing the course of justice, in a case in which she was the victim of violence and her attacker (and her stalker) actually admitted the violence.

In May, Seymour Platt, Keeler’s son, together with her granddaughter and legal team, including the human rights barrister Felicity Gerry KC, handed in the petition together with a 300-page dossier.

Historic discrimination against women

According to Gerry, Keeler’s 1963 conviction for perjury was the ‘ultimate in slut-shaming’ and her posthumous exoneration would be an overdue opportunity to acknowledge historic discrimination against women in the justice system.

The writer Rebecca West captured

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
NLJ this week: Family law urged to ditch adversarial instincts
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll