header-logo header-logo

15 May 2015 / Kerry Underwood
Issue: 7652 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Chronicle of a death foretold (Pt 2)

nlj_may_15_backpage

Kerry Underwood continues his analysis of the decline & fall of ABSs

Legal aid cuts are only one of a number of areas where the government has deliberately restricted access to justice by means of costs. Other examples include the introduction of employment tribunal fees in July 2013 and the up to 600% increase in court fees (9 March 2015). The increase in court fees was not just to cover costs but to make a profit out of the court system so as to subsidise other government expenditure. In introducing the Civil Proceedings and Family Proceedings Fees (Amendment) Order 2015 (SI 2015/576), Lord Faulks, the then Justice Minister said: “The purpose of this draft order is to introduce enhanced fees to commence certain proceedings for the recovery of money in the courts of England and Wales…Enhanced fees are fees that are set above the costs of the proceedings to which they relate…The order also fixes three fees that are already currently above cost.”

Attack on ordinary people

Thus, for the first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll