header-logo header-logo

Chronicle of a death foretold (Pt 2)

15 May 2015 / Kerry Underwood
Issue: 7652 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_may_15_backpage

Kerry Underwood continues his analysis of the decline & fall of ABSs

Legal aid cuts are only one of a number of areas where the government has deliberately restricted access to justice by means of costs. Other examples include the introduction of employment tribunal fees in July 2013 and the up to 600% increase in court fees (9 March 2015). The increase in court fees was not just to cover costs but to make a profit out of the court system so as to subsidise other government expenditure. In introducing the Civil Proceedings and Family Proceedings Fees (Amendment) Order 2015 (SI 2015/576), Lord Faulks, the then Justice Minister said: “The purpose of this draft order is to introduce enhanced fees to commence certain proceedings for the recovery of money in the courts of England and Wales…Enhanced fees are fees that are set above the costs of the proceedings to which they relate…The order also fixes three fees that are already currently above cost.”

Attack on ordinary people

Thus, for the first

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll