header-logo header-logo

13 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

CIArb issues guidance on remote proceedings

Guidance for arbitrators on remote proceedings is now available from the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb)

CIArb launched its ‘Guidance note on remote dispute resolution proceedings’ last week. It is designed to equip both neutrals and parties with the necessary tools and techniques for conducting dispute resolution proceedings in line with social distance regulations. The authors are CIArb’s research executive Kateryna Honcharenko and research manager Mercy McBrayer, and the note includes input from eminent practitioners around the world.

It offers practical advice on how proceedings can not only continue under remote conditions but proactively adapt in ways that will ultimately be positive for the way dispute resolution is practised. Contents include factors to consider when choosing communication platforms, ensuring effective use of witnesses and experts and, crucially, safeguarding confidentiality. A helpful checklist is also included. The guiding principles can be applied to any dispute procedure.

Lewis Johnston, CIArb’s head of policy and external affairs, said: ‘The coronavirus social distancing measures pose a huge challenge, and we’re proud to unveil the Guidance Note on Remote Dispute Resolution Proceedings to allow neutrals and parties to operate as effectively as possible under these circumstances.

‘Disputes professionals are by nature adaptive and agile, and I have full confidence that our members will rise to this challenge. Furthermore, the ad hoc procedures and rules we offer are ideally suited to allow for the kind of flexibility that will be invaluable at this time.’

Timothy Cooke, partner at Stephenson Harwood and vice-chair of the sub-committee on witness conferencing established by the Singapore branch of CIArb in 2017, described the guidance note as ‘an indispensable point of reference that will be of practical benefit for those planning a remote hearing’. He said it ‘offers concise, practical advice’ and ‘covers a broad range of technical, logistical, legal and procedural matters and concludes with a helpful checklist of items for consideration’.

Download the new guidance note here.

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Irwin Mitchell—Louisa Donaghy

Irwin Mitchell—Louisa Donaghy

National military team expands in Leeds with legal director appointment

Taylor Wessing—Jamie Humphreys

Taylor Wessing—Jamie Humphreys

Disputes and investigations team welcomes product liability partner hire

Spector Constant & Williams—Michael Michaeloudis and team

Spector Constant & Williams—Michael Michaeloudis and team

London firm launches employment department with four-lawyer team hire

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll