header-logo header-logo

13 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

CIArb issues guidance on remote proceedings

Guidance for arbitrators on remote proceedings is now available from the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb)

CIArb launched its ‘Guidance note on remote dispute resolution proceedings’ last week. It is designed to equip both neutrals and parties with the necessary tools and techniques for conducting dispute resolution proceedings in line with social distance regulations. The authors are CIArb’s research executive Kateryna Honcharenko and research manager Mercy McBrayer, and the note includes input from eminent practitioners around the world.

It offers practical advice on how proceedings can not only continue under remote conditions but proactively adapt in ways that will ultimately be positive for the way dispute resolution is practised. Contents include factors to consider when choosing communication platforms, ensuring effective use of witnesses and experts and, crucially, safeguarding confidentiality. A helpful checklist is also included. The guiding principles can be applied to any dispute procedure.

Lewis Johnston, CIArb’s head of policy and external affairs, said: ‘The coronavirus social distancing measures pose a huge challenge, and we’re proud to unveil the Guidance Note on Remote Dispute Resolution Proceedings to allow neutrals and parties to operate as effectively as possible under these circumstances.

‘Disputes professionals are by nature adaptive and agile, and I have full confidence that our members will rise to this challenge. Furthermore, the ad hoc procedures and rules we offer are ideally suited to allow for the kind of flexibility that will be invaluable at this time.’

Timothy Cooke, partner at Stephenson Harwood and vice-chair of the sub-committee on witness conferencing established by the Singapore branch of CIArb in 2017, described the guidance note as ‘an indispensable point of reference that will be of practical benefit for those planning a remote hearing’. He said it ‘offers concise, practical advice’ and ‘covers a broad range of technical, logistical, legal and procedural matters and concludes with a helpful checklist of items for consideration’.

Download the new guidance note here.

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DSW Legal—James Mallender

DSW Legal—James Mallender

Business advisory group launches dedicated legal division with senior appointment

Gilson Gray—Peter Millican

Gilson Gray—Peter Millican

London corporate practice with partner appointment

Ward Hadaway—Alex Cooper

Ward Hadaway—Alex Cooper

Corporate team welcomes partner in Leeds

NEWS
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
The High Court has upheld the Metropolitan Police’s live facial recognition policy, rejecting claims that its deployment unlawfully interferes with privacy and protest rights
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
back-to-top-scroll