header-logo header-logo

CIArb issues guidance on remote proceedings

13 April 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-detail
Guidance for arbitrators on remote proceedings is now available from the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb)

CIArb launched its ‘Guidance note on remote dispute resolution proceedings’ last week. It is designed to equip both neutrals and parties with the necessary tools and techniques for conducting dispute resolution proceedings in line with social distance regulations. The authors are CIArb’s research executive Kateryna Honcharenko and research manager Mercy McBrayer, and the note includes input from eminent practitioners around the world.

It offers practical advice on how proceedings can not only continue under remote conditions but proactively adapt in ways that will ultimately be positive for the way dispute resolution is practised. Contents include factors to consider when choosing communication platforms, ensuring effective use of witnesses and experts and, crucially, safeguarding confidentiality. A helpful checklist is also included. The guiding principles can be applied to any dispute procedure.

Lewis Johnston, CIArb’s head of policy and external affairs, said: ‘The coronavirus social distancing measures pose a huge challenge, and we’re proud to unveil the Guidance Note on Remote Dispute Resolution Proceedings to allow neutrals and parties to operate as effectively as possible under these circumstances.

‘Disputes professionals are by nature adaptive and agile, and I have full confidence that our members will rise to this challenge. Furthermore, the ad hoc procedures and rules we offer are ideally suited to allow for the kind of flexibility that will be invaluable at this time.’

Timothy Cooke, partner at Stephenson Harwood and vice-chair of the sub-committee on witness conferencing established by the Singapore branch of CIArb in 2017, described the guidance note as ‘an indispensable point of reference that will be of practical benefit for those planning a remote hearing’. He said it ‘offers concise, practical advice’ and ‘covers a broad range of technical, logistical, legal and procedural matters and concludes with a helpful checklist of items for consideration’.

Download the new guidance note here.

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll