header-logo header-logo

20 July 2018
Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

City firms could subsidise legal aid

Fortunes are made in the City while legal aid lawyers struggle—is it time for the commercial sector to pay back some of the profits it has received from the public sector?

Writing in NLJ this week, Geoffrey Bindman QC compares the astronomical earnings of City partners and high starting salaries of City trainees with those in the publicly funded sector. Bindman, who has worked at both poles of the profession, says legal aid lawyers’ work ‘demands no less knowledge, skill or stress than commercial law’.

He points out that City wealth is often derived from huge fees charged to the public sector, citing the discovery by a joint parliamentary committee that Slaughter and May delivered bills for over £8m to Carillion for legal advice in the eight months before its collapse. Carillion was mainly engaged in outsourced public projects.

Bindman concludes: ‘Would it not be fair to recoup from the commercial sector some of the profit they have received from the public purse?’

Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Senior associate joins family law team in London

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Firm appoints chief financial officer as it expands Essex office footprint

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
back-to-top-scroll