header-logo header-logo

20 July 2018
Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

City firms could subsidise legal aid

Fortunes are made in the City while legal aid lawyers struggle—is it time for the commercial sector to pay back some of the profits it has received from the public sector?

Writing in NLJ this week, Geoffrey Bindman QC compares the astronomical earnings of City partners and high starting salaries of City trainees with those in the publicly funded sector. Bindman, who has worked at both poles of the profession, says legal aid lawyers’ work ‘demands no less knowledge, skill or stress than commercial law’.

He points out that City wealth is often derived from huge fees charged to the public sector, citing the discovery by a joint parliamentary committee that Slaughter and May delivered bills for over £8m to Carillion for legal advice in the eight months before its collapse. Carillion was mainly engaged in outsourced public projects.

Bindman concludes: ‘Would it not be fair to recoup from the commercial sector some of the profit they have received from the public purse?’

Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll