header-logo header-logo

20 July 2018
Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

City firms could subsidise legal aid

Fortunes are made in the City while legal aid lawyers struggle—is it time for the commercial sector to pay back some of the profits it has received from the public sector?

Writing in NLJ this week, Geoffrey Bindman QC compares the astronomical earnings of City partners and high starting salaries of City trainees with those in the publicly funded sector. Bindman, who has worked at both poles of the profession, says legal aid lawyers’ work ‘demands no less knowledge, skill or stress than commercial law’.

He points out that City wealth is often derived from huge fees charged to the public sector, citing the discovery by a joint parliamentary committee that Slaughter and May delivered bills for over £8m to Carillion for legal advice in the eight months before its collapse. Carillion was mainly engaged in outsourced public projects.

Bindman concludes: ‘Would it not be fair to recoup from the commercial sector some of the profit they have received from the public purse?’

Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll