header-logo header-logo

City lawyers scotch PII proposal

25 September 2015
Issue: 7669 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lowering the professional indemnity insurance (PII) threshold would not necessarily reduce costs and could only have “downside risk”, City lawyers have warned.

Responding to Solicitors Regulation Authority suggestions in a July discussion paper that the PII minimum cover of £2m could be reduced to as low as £500,000 in some cases to reduce premiums and promote greater flexibility in the profession, the City of London Law Society (CLLS) expressed concern.

In its official response, published last week, the CLLS points out that any cost savings would be “postponed” or “tapered” for the six-year run-off period which operates. It points out that, given the price of houses, no firm that does conveyancing in London or the south east could limit cover to £500,000, and nor would firms with commercial clients be advised to do so.

The CLLS states: “The discussion paper adduces no evidence that any of the proposals would in fact attract cost reductions of any meaningful magnitude.”

 
Issue: 7669 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll