header-logo header-logo

19 February 2009 / David Tyme
Issue: 7357 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Employment
printer mail-detail

Civil Disharmony

Post Ladele, employers should be wary of exempting employees from sensitive duties, says David Tyme

In Ladele v LB Islington [2009] All ER (D) 100 (Jan) the claimant, who is a Christian, worked for LB Islington as a registrar of births, deaths and marriages for several years. The claimant considered a civil partnership to be a marriage in all but name only, and therefore the formation of a civil partnership was wrong. In 2004 she made it known that she was unwilling to undertake civil partnership ceremonies. The council in furtherance of its statutory duty decided that such ceremonies should be conducted by existing staff. The claimant made arrangements to change her rota to avoid civil partnership ceremonies. Subsequently, two other members of staff, one a Muslim and the other a Christian, similarly objected to performing civil partnership ceremonies: by way of compromise the council offered to limit their involvement to registration duties.

 

Disciplinary action

In March 2006 the claimant was accused of discrimination by two gay colleagues on grounds

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll