header-logo header-logo

18 January 2008
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Civil litigation

Crane v Canons Leisure Centre [2007] EWCA Civ 1352, [2007] All ER (D) 281 (Dec)

The distinction between “base costs” and “disbursements” in a collective conditional fee agreement is between:

(i) charges by the solicitors for work which they themselves do or for which they are directly responsible; and

(ii) expenses which they incur for the client, some of which are for other people’s work for which they are not directly responsible and which they simply pass on to the client at cost.

If solicitors properly choose to delegate their own work, they remain entitled to charge on their own account and the proper amount of the charge is not necessarily the same as the amount which they pay to their subcontractor (per Lord Justice May, at para 14, with whom Lady Justice Hallett agreed).

It followed that the fees of costs consultants who conducted a detailed costs assessment were doing solicitors’ work, for which the solicitors remain liable to their client, and so the fees were properly described as profit costs, not disbursements (and a success

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll