header-logo header-logo

30 November 2017
Issue: 7772 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Civil proof

The civil standard of proof is to be adopted for professional misconduct proceedings against barristers.

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has confirmed the change, which was put out to consultation earlier this year. Subject to approval from the Legal Services Board (LSB), the standard of proof will change from ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ to ‘the balance of probabilities’, bringing the Bar’s disciplinary arrangements in line with most other professions.

The BSB proposes to apply the civil standard to alleged breaches of the professional code occurring after 31 March 2019.

The BSB’s director of professional conduct, Sara Jagger, said: ‘The revised standard will complement other changes that we have made recently to improve our rules and processes, including the new disciplinary tribunal regulations that came into force on 1 November.’

Issue: 7772 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll