header-logo header-logo

06 June 2013 / Cathrine Grubb
Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Civil war?

What will the removal of civil liability for breaches of health & safety legislation mean, asks Cathrine Grubb

Section 47(2) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 as it stands, provides that breaches of health and safety legislation confer a civil right of action unless otherwise stated. Section 69 of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 amends s 47 to reverse that presumption, so that civil liability will only apply where this is specifically provided for in the regulations.

This amendment was initially opposed by the House of Lords, when they voted against the changes on 6 March 2013. They subsequently backed down and approved amended proposals on 22 April 2013. The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 received royal assent on 25 April 2013. The amendment is not yet fully in force, but once it is it will apply to all cases where breach of a provision occurs after the date of commencement.

Removing civil liability will mean that claimants will be under a duty to prove a case in common law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll