header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 12 September 2014

12 September 2014
Issue: 7621 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

No cracking & hot-tubbing; intestacy law & Inheritance Act reforms & a lowdown on the update

“CALM DOWN DEAR”

New guidance on the instruction of experts in civil cases has just been published by the Civil Justice Council and then republished in revised form. However, do not panic because it will not come formally into force until this autumn when it will replace the protocol on experts which currently forms part of CPR PD35.

The guidance, like PD35, usefully points out that while permission from the court to rely on an expert or call them to give oral evidence is required, an expert can generally be instructed by a party without any permission. Nevertheless, many practitioners habitually go after court permission to instruct. And as to what is actually new:

  • a section on sequential exchange of reports suggesting that in this situation the defendant’s report should usually be produced in response to the claimant’s report;
  • where a solicitor sends additional documents to an expert before finalising of their report, the expert is to be told
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll