header-logo header-logo

12 September 2014
Issue: 7621 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 12 September 2014

No cracking & hot-tubbing; intestacy law & Inheritance Act reforms & a lowdown on the update

“CALM DOWN DEAR”

New guidance on the instruction of experts in civil cases has just been published by the Civil Justice Council and then republished in revised form. However, do not panic because it will not come formally into force until this autumn when it will replace the protocol on experts which currently forms part of CPR PD35.

The guidance, like PD35, usefully points out that while permission from the court to rely on an expert or call them to give oral evidence is required, an expert can generally be instructed by a party without any permission. Nevertheless, many practitioners habitually go after court permission to instruct. And as to what is actually new:

  • a section on sequential exchange of reports suggesting that in this situation the defendant’s report should usually be produced in response to the claimant’s report;
  • where a solicitor sends additional documents to an expert before finalising of their report, the expert is to be told
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll