header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 164, Issue 7621

12 September 2014
IN THIS ISSUE

Roger Smith looks to the future

James Maloney considers the pros & cons of charitable incorporated organisations

Is McDonald the last word on Art 8 & private landlords, asks Philip Sissons

Elizabeth Milbourn examines the courts’ approach to liability to injured bus passengers

Re G (children)(Adoption proceedings) [2014] EWHC 2605 (Fam), [2014] All ER (D) 44 (Aug)

No cracking & hot-tubbing; intestacy law & Inheritance Act reforms & a lowdown on the update

Roderick Ramage discusses the property characteristics of “e-material” & shares a new precedent

Top Brands Ltd and another v Sharma and another [2014] EWHC 2753 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 32 (Aug)

Lehman Brothers Finance AG (in liquidation) v Klaus Tschira Stiftung GmbH and another company [2014] EWHC 2782 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 42 (Aug)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll