header-logo header-logo

12 September 2014 / James Maloney
Issue: 7621 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Incorporating change

James Maloney considers the pros & cons of charitable incorporated organisations

The charitable incorporated organisation (or CIO), a new legal structure for charities, has proved popular since it first became available in January 2013. More than 2,300 CIOs have now been registered by the Charity Commission, accounting for over 27% of new charity registrations in the period for which they have been available. How, then, do CIOs compare to other legal structures?

Advantages of using a CIO

The CIO offers an alternative to traditional legal structures for charities. These established structures were originally designed for non-charitable purposes, although all have been adapted for use by charities. They can be divided between those (such as the company limited by guarantee (CLG)) that are incorporated and those (such as the trust or unincorporated association) that are not.

When compared with a charitable trust or unincorporated association

The CIO structure offers two key advantages:

  • First, the protection of limited liability status: trustees (and members) are generally protected from financial liabilities the CIO incurs.
  • Second, the benefit of separate legal
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll