header-logo header-logo

Incorporating change

12 September 2014 / James Maloney
Issue: 7621 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

James Maloney considers the pros & cons of charitable incorporated organisations

The charitable incorporated organisation (or CIO), a new legal structure for charities, has proved popular since it first became available in January 2013. More than 2,300 CIOs have now been registered by the Charity Commission, accounting for over 27% of new charity registrations in the period for which they have been available. How, then, do CIOs compare to other legal structures?

Advantages of using a CIO

The CIO offers an alternative to traditional legal structures for charities. These established structures were originally designed for non-charitable purposes, although all have been adapted for use by charities. They can be divided between those (such as the company limited by guarantee (CLG)) that are incorporated and those (such as the trust or unincorporated association) that are not.

When compared with a charitable trust or unincorporated association

The CIO structure offers two key advantages:

  • First, the protection of limited liability status: trustees (and members) are generally protected from financial liabilities the CIO incurs.
  • Second, the benefit of separate legal
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll