header-logo header-logo

12 September 2014 / James Maloney
Issue: 7621 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Incorporating change

James Maloney considers the pros & cons of charitable incorporated organisations

The charitable incorporated organisation (or CIO), a new legal structure for charities, has proved popular since it first became available in January 2013. More than 2,300 CIOs have now been registered by the Charity Commission, accounting for over 27% of new charity registrations in the period for which they have been available. How, then, do CIOs compare to other legal structures?

Advantages of using a CIO

The CIO offers an alternative to traditional legal structures for charities. These established structures were originally designed for non-charitable purposes, although all have been adapted for use by charities. They can be divided between those (such as the company limited by guarantee (CLG)) that are incorporated and those (such as the trust or unincorporated association) that are not.

When compared with a charitable trust or unincorporated association

The CIO structure offers two key advantages:

  • First, the protection of limited liability status: trustees (and members) are generally protected from financial liabilities the CIO incurs.
  • Second, the benefit of separate legal
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll