header-logo header-logo

Incorporating change

12 September 2014 / James Maloney
Issue: 7621 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

James Maloney considers the pros & cons of charitable incorporated organisations

The charitable incorporated organisation (or CIO), a new legal structure for charities, has proved popular since it first became available in January 2013. More than 2,300 CIOs have now been registered by the Charity Commission, accounting for over 27% of new charity registrations in the period for which they have been available. How, then, do CIOs compare to other legal structures?

Advantages of using a CIO

The CIO offers an alternative to traditional legal structures for charities. These established structures were originally designed for non-charitable purposes, although all have been adapted for use by charities. They can be divided between those (such as the company limited by guarantee (CLG)) that are incorporated and those (such as the trust or unincorporated association) that are not.

When compared with a charitable trust or unincorporated association

The CIO structure offers two key advantages:

  • First, the protection of limited liability status: trustees (and members) are generally protected from financial liabilities the CIO incurs.
  • Second, the benefit of separate legal
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll