header-logo header-logo

12 September 2014 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7621 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

It’s e-material!

Roderick Ramage discusses the property characteristics of “e-material” & shares a new precedent

Computer hardware is a personal chattel as defined in the Administration of Estates Act 1925, s 55(2)(x) as altered from 1 October 2014 by the Inheritance and Trustees’ Powers Act 2014, but not if used by the deceased solely or mainly for business purposes. The physical devices (memory sticks, CDs, floppy discs, external hard discs etc) are capable also of being personal chattels, again subject to the business test. The programs and all data files (documents, images, sound etc), even if stored on a computer or a device which is a personal chattel, cannot be personal chattels, because they are not tangible property. The programs accessed in the cloud (almost certainly) and the data placed in the cloud files (quite possibly but still unsettled) are not the property of the person who uses them and, in the case of data files placed them there; see work by Queen Mary University of London. Therefore, the property characteristics of “e-material” are not altogether clear

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll