header-logo header-logo

27 November 2014
Issue: 7632 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 28 November 2014

Parents’ positive presumption, first jactitation, now exequatur, joint tenant beware, & where the multies are going

Mum and dad do you good

They have arrived and to prove it, they are here. These are the provisions relating to various private law child applications contained in s 11 of the Children and Families Act 2014 which were commenced on 22 October 2014 by SI 2014/2749 but do not apply to prior proceedings which are still running. For reasons best known to someone, s 11 has come under the auspices of the Department for Education and was omitted from the ostensibly world-shattering children and family reforms which hit us on 22 April 2014.

So what is the latest reform all about? In the matter of contested applications to make, vary or discharge an order under s 8 of the Children Act 1989 and applications for parental responsibility under ss 44(1) (c), (2A) or 4ZA (1) (c) or (5) (got that?!), the presumption is raised that the involvement of a parent in the life of the child

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll