header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
27 November 2014
Issue: 7632 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 28 November 2014

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Parents’ positive presumption, first jactitation, now exequatur, joint tenant beware, & where the multies are going

Mum and dad do you good

They have arrived and to prove it, they are here. These are the provisions relating to various private law child applications contained in s 11 of the Children and Families Act 2014 which were commenced on 22 October 2014 by SI 2014/2749 but do not apply to prior proceedings which are still running. For reasons best known to someone, s 11 has come under the auspices of the Department for Education and was omitted from the ostensibly world-shattering children and family reforms which hit us on 22 April 2014.

So what is the latest reform all about? In the matter of contested applications to make, vary or discharge an order under s 8 of the Children Act 1989 and applications for parental responsibility under ss 44(1) (c), (2A) or 4ZA (1) (c) or (5) (got that?!), the presumption is raised that the involvement of a parent in the life of the child

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Push to scrap ‘vague’ public office misconduct law
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
NLJ this week: World Cup faces legal storm before kick-off
FIFA’s 2026 Men's World Cup is already mired in controversy, with complaints over ‘excessive prices’ and opaque ticketing. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dr Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys warns that governing bodies may face scrutiny under EU competition law, with allegations of a ‘dominant—if not monopolistic—position’ in ticket sales
NLJ this week: Trade mark practice splits widen post-Brexit
Ten years after Brexit, UK and EU trade mark regimes are drifting apart in practice if not principle. Writing in NLJ this week, Roger Lush and Lara Elder of Carpmaels & Ransford highlight tighter UK scrutiny after SkyKick, where overly broad filings may signal ‘bad faith’
NLJ this week: Sanctions ruling casts ‘wide net’ over global finance
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
NLJ this week: England’s courts cement status as fraud battleground
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll