header-logo header-logo

23 January 2015
Issue: 7637 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 23 January 2015

Regulated unregulated credit, cross-border harassment & CPR latest

NOT AS IT SEEMS

Prior to 6 April 2008 consumer credit agreements for more than £25,000 were not regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974). For nine years before then, Northern Rock had a product which allowed borrowers to take out an unsecured loan as an adjunct to their mortgage under which interest was charged at the mortgage rate. However, Northern Rock used the same paperwork for these over £25,000 loans as they did for the £25,000 and under loans (as did certain other lenders). Not only the loan agreement itself but the pre-contractual and other contractual documentation repeatedly informed borrowers that the loan was regulated and that they would benefit from the rights available under CCA 1974.

The failure to distinguish between what was regulated and what was intended by the Northern Rock to be unregulated has presented headaches which a bucketful of aspirin would fail to mitigate for the state-owned Northern Rock successor company. They arise because it was discovered that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll