header-logo header-logo

23 January 2015
Issue: 7637 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 23 January 2015

Regulated unregulated credit, cross-border harassment & CPR latest

NOT AS IT SEEMS

Prior to 6 April 2008 consumer credit agreements for more than £25,000 were not regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974). For nine years before then, Northern Rock had a product which allowed borrowers to take out an unsecured loan as an adjunct to their mortgage under which interest was charged at the mortgage rate. However, Northern Rock used the same paperwork for these over £25,000 loans as they did for the £25,000 and under loans (as did certain other lenders). Not only the loan agreement itself but the pre-contractual and other contractual documentation repeatedly informed borrowers that the loan was regulated and that they would benefit from the rights available under CCA 1974.

The failure to distinguish between what was regulated and what was intended by the Northern Rock to be unregulated has presented headaches which a bucketful of aspirin would fail to mitigate for the state-owned Northern Rock successor company. They arise because it was discovered that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll