header-logo header-logo

13 August 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7899 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil Way: 14 August 2020

Enforcement agents under control; Possession paralysis punctured; Hello reactivation notice

Enforcement agents awake

Two sets of CPR amendment rules (SIs 2020/747/751 for the third and fourth respectively) have arrived with PDs for each and inspiring updates 122 and 123. Let’s have a look at what is effective on 23 August 2020 and which is almost exclusively devoted to possessions. There’s a feast of material for later on, mainly 1 October 2020. Watch this space.

The 23 August 2020 is the day that enforcement agents awake from their slumber. It is the day on which the stay on possession proceedings and execution of possession orders (see ‘Civil way’, NLJ 19 June 2020, p17) is lifted and the bar on taking control of goods at a dwelling (see ‘Civil way’, NLJ 8 May 2020, p24) comes to an end. For business premises in England, the enforcement of forfeiture and re-entry rights on the ground of rent arrears (see ‘Civil way’, NLJ 3 July 2020, p17) presently remain paralysed until 30 September 2020.


Agents

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll