header-logo header-logo

14 February 2025 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8104 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 14 February 2025

No hiding for claimants; leasehold qualifier gone; Ogden Obliges; the world of ETs; cloudy lemon cider.

CLAIMANTS EXPOSED

The government is to legislate to include in the Register of Judgments, Orders and Fines, run by Registry Trust, the name —but neither the address nor the favourite knuckleduster supplier—of the claimant. One of the outcomes not considered is that claimants will be bombarded at the wrong office by registry snoopers with pleas to be told what dirt they have on the defendant, whether they know if they own a garden water feature which could be easily taken away by a bailiff, and are they going to bring bankruptcy proceedings or not.

These days, the registry catches money judgments of both the High Court and county court, excluding orders in family proceedings and judgments for arrears of mortgage instalments or rent unless and until the claimant takes a step to enforce. And—this is the big exclusion—a judgment arising out of a contested hearing (even though the defence was a pile of nonsense

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll