header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 15 November 2019

14 November 2019
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Early cash; ADR: agree it, do it; eternally privileged; look, no boarding card

Interim costs pre-judgment

The court does have CPR 44.2 power to order interim costs where the only issue is on quantum, but before that issue is resolved and resolution is some time away. An order for detailed assessment on quantum was not a prerequisite. That was the conclusion of Judge Robinson in HI v Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust (Case no 3SE90091) in Sheffield on 25 February 2019. There has been no binding High Court authority to this effect, although leave to appeal in HI was refused by Irwin LJ. On the back of these events, interim applications have become commonplace in high-value clinical negligence and personal injury claims where there is likely to be a substantial delay before quantum can be determined.

Now comes the judgment on an interim costs application of Master Cook in RXK (a child proceeding by her mother and litigation friend GXK) v Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWHC 2751 (QB),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll