header-logo header-logo

14 November 2019
Issue: 7864 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 15 November 2019

Early cash; ADR: agree it, do it; eternally privileged; look, no boarding card

Interim costs pre-judgment

The court does have CPR 44.2 power to order interim costs where the only issue is on quantum, but before that issue is resolved and resolution is some time away. An order for detailed assessment on quantum was not a prerequisite. That was the conclusion of Judge Robinson in HI v Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust (Case no 3SE90091) in Sheffield on 25 February 2019. There has been no binding High Court authority to this effect, although leave to appeal in HI was refused by Irwin LJ. On the back of these events, interim applications have become commonplace in high-value clinical negligence and personal injury claims where there is likely to be a substantial delay before quantum can be determined.

Now comes the judgment on an interim costs application of Master Cook in RXK (a child proceeding by her mother and litigation friend GXK) v Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2019] EWHC 2751

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll