header-logo header-logo

19 February 2018 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7780 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way

Spa justice; Charge queue; ‘Heridementary, my dear VO’; Post-judgment ‘lie’ discovery.

Hot hub news

The FPR Committee was this week expected to give the go-ahead to a new Form A for use in pilots for the Financial Remedies Court (FRC) (see NLJ 26 January 2018, p16). It will contain sufficient information to enable a very early allocation decision to be made by a judicial gatekeeper at the regional hub. A pilot FPR PD 36.2 PD and revised form E are in the pipeline along with work to separate—‘delink’ is the buzz word—divorce and ‘money’ so that they are started and pursued by completely separate processes. Prospective leadership and district judges to huddle in the pilot hubs have their hands up or are in hiding (as the case may be) and a tentative list of the pilot areas and the financial remedies hearing centres (FRHCs) under which they will operate has been drawn up. For instance, the proposal for the London area is that the hub should be at the central family court with the FHRCs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll