header-logo header-logo

16 June 2023
Issue: 8029 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 16 June 2023

The King’s Bench Way; agreement for disagreement; broadband on paper; perils of a police report.

SUPREME MIX

No surprise. The Supreme Court has granted permission to appeal in the whiplash-plus-something-else case of Hassam and another v Rabot and another [2023] EWCA Civ 19 (see ‘Civil way’, NLJ, 3 February 2023, p15). And just as the Official Injury Claim portal was celebrating its second birthday with customary soft tissue buns and heralding an intermediate release for 14 June 2023, which was calculated to ensure that the Court of Appeal’s decision was reflected in the portal journey. It is going ahead.


SHARP EXPECTS

The ninth edition of the King’s Bench Guide has been published. Don’t rush to print out unless you have 230 pages going spare. It does not have the status of a practice direction or the force of law. So, don’t waste your time on it? Depends on whether or not you fancy your complexion turning crimson and an adverse costs order when you next appear before a master. You

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll