header-logo header-logo

16 June 2023
Issue: 8029 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 16 June 2023

The King’s Bench Way; agreement for disagreement; broadband on paper; perils of a police report.

SUPREME MIX

No surprise. The Supreme Court has granted permission to appeal in the whiplash-plus-something-else case of Hassam and another v Rabot and another [2023] EWCA Civ 19 (see ‘Civil way’, NLJ, 3 February 2023, p15). And just as the Official Injury Claim portal was celebrating its second birthday with customary soft tissue buns and heralding an intermediate release for 14 June 2023, which was calculated to ensure that the Court of Appeal’s decision was reflected in the portal journey. It is going ahead.


SHARP EXPECTS

The ninth edition of the King’s Bench Guide has been published. Don’t rush to print out unless you have 230 pages going spare. It does not have the status of a practice direction or the force of law. So, don’t waste your time on it? Depends on whether or not you fancy your complexion turning crimson and an adverse costs order when you next appear before a master. You

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll