header-logo header-logo

19 July 2018
Issue: 7802 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 20 July 2018

More court fee overcharges; insolvency PD changed; bundle diet; HMRC assessed.

FEES OVERCHARGE PART 2

And I’ve spent the past three years berating supermarkets for misleading price labels! Over at the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) we saw last time I was with you that it had got it wrong with the fee collected on issue of low value stage 3 protocol claims (See ‘Civil way’, NLJ 6 July 2018 p13). It’s another mea culpa with the Court of Protection, Civil Proceedings and Magistrates’ Courts Fees (Amendment) Order 2018 (SI 2018/812) which comes into force this coming Monday 23 July 2018 and recognises that certain fees have been levied at over full cost recovery levels. Action is being taken to refund overcharges. Officials are working on detailed arrangements for a refund scheme. Perhaps consideration will be given to a free coffee and a prize draw for those out of pocket, though, more likely, we will see the sacrifice of some staff to finance the scheme and future loss of revenue. The MoJ tells

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll