header-logo header-logo

Civil Way: 17 September 2021

17 September 2021 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7948 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Skates needed for fee saves; Welch business; Mediation money; Domestic abuse update; Online divorce mandatory; CPO compensation up

THE BILL

Race is on The threatened court fee hikes will happen with a pinch of ‘remodelling’. But on what date? Early Autumn, they said. I consulted on when that season begins and the majority view which I accepted was 22 September 2021. True to their word, the Court Fees (Miscellaneous Amendments) Order 2021 (SI 2021/985) which does the damage will come into force on 30 September 2021. So you had better get your skates on to save, for example, £43 on an application for divorce, nullity or civil partnership dissolution, £20 on a civil application notice (£8 where by consent) and £85 on a multi-track trial fee (and with no transitional relief on that one or elsewhere). Although court fees have nothing to do with the judiciary, the county court at Central London poked its nose in at consultation as did a respondent called Min. There’s a sweet pill with the raising

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll