header-logo header-logo

15 November 2018
Issue: 7817 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 16 November 2018

Worse for assured shortholds; searching for an adoptee; stay halts service; old maintenance arrears.

LANDLORDS NEED MORE ASPIRINS

The secret is out. Assured shorthold tenancy agreements made in respect of dwellings in England before 1 October 2015 are now subject to the provisions of ss 33–38 and 40 of the Deregulation Act 2015 (DA 2015) which initially applied only to assured shortholds granted on or after 1 October 2015.

The old tenancies are caught as from 1 October 2018. To blame is s 41(3) of DA 2015. And so, my landlord friends and their advisers, for these old tenancies, we welcome the law we have come to hug which prevents retaliatory eviction, requires the issue of possession proceedings within six months of service of the s 21 notice, removes the s 21(4) trap for the notice to specify its expiry as the last day of a period of the tenancy, and deals with repayment of rent in a limited situation where the tenancy ends before time (see ‘Civil way’, 165 NLJ 7671, p17;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll