header-logo header-logo

13 December 2018
Issue: 7821 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 14 December 2018

Invoice assignment bar goes; disbursementless bills; no child support, no passport; latest service charge wars

ROLL UP, ROLL UP

So you are a small or medium sized business and you need the cash flowing in. Then assign the right to future payment of your invoices to a finance company. Around 40,000 businesses in the UK use invoice finance at a typical cost of 20% of value. It would be more but for the common contractual prohibition against assignment.

To the rescue come the Business Contract Terms (Assignment of Receivables) Regulations 2018 (SI 2018/1254) (made under s 1 of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015) which apply to any contractual term made on or after 31 December 2018, five years since the idea of legislation in the area was floated with a government discussion paper. The regulations extend to England, Wales and Northern Island. Any term prohibiting or imposing a condition on the assignment of a receivable (invoices and other rights to be paid money under a contract) is to have no effect.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll