header-logo header-logo

18 June 2009 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 19 June 2009

CFO rates hit rock bottom; Ecstasy for tolerated trespassers; Master loses Rolls; Reduced assets

 

 

 

Civil way

CFO rates hit rock bottom; Ecstasy for tolerated trespassers; Master loses Rolls; Reduced assets

Not so special

Court Funds Office’s special account (mainly for investment of funds for children and others who lack capacity) and basic account (mainly for funds held on deposit during proceedings) saw their rates halved to 3% and 2% respectively on 1 February 2009. The reduced rates were halved again on 1 June 2009. For the innumerate, this means the special rate is down to 1.5% and the basic rate to 1%. Litigation friends may have a go at seeking to persuade the court to allow them to invest themselves. The special account change is of more than academic importance to personal injury pleaders as the rate is utilised in calculating interest on special losses in personal injury claims.

TA TA to the TT

The tolerated trespasser (TT) (a status described as “conceptually peculiar, even oxymoronic” by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Senior associate joins family law team in London

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Firm appoints chief financial officer as it expands Essex office footprint

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

NEWS
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
back-to-top-scroll