header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 20 January 2023

20 January 2023
Issue: 8009 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail
Traffic commissioner etiquette; a spot of SI trouble; latest FPR update; lessors clobbered online; second bite for flight delays; family overspending.

THE NAME GAME

What you and the usher call the basement judge in pre- and post-hearing banter is not covered in the recent message from on high about modes of address in courts and tribunals. The wokeless direction is to call them ‘Judge’ and no longer ‘Sir’ or ‘Madam’, thereby ‘reflecting the important judicial role and maintaining the necessary degree of respect’. This courtesy is to be extended to masters, district judges, Upper Tribunal judges, judges of the Employment Appeal Tribunal, district judges (magistrates’ courts), First-tier Tribunal judges and employment judges—what would be called the ‘jewels in the crown’, unless it was the Lord Chancellor speaking on reviewing pay. Whether the same mode of address should be adopted upon encountering one of these jewels in Marks & Spencer over lunch is unclear. No attention, however, has been given to the bandwagon-climbers-on, to wit the traffic commissioners. We are now told that they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll