header-logo header-logo

22 September 2023 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8041 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 22 September 2023

Look, no judge; If it won’t work, scrap it; CPO compensation up; Statutory demand set asides; Deemed service gets dodgier; New ET forms; DJ gigs

THE INSIDIOUS GAG

A guide from the bosses to judicial conduct has been around and frequently ignored for 20 years. Now it has been revised ‘to reflect changes in wider aspects of judicial and public life’ and to be thrown at the erring judicial office holder when being carpeted. ‘But you did say it was not a code, my Lord.’ It even catches beaks and coroners and, wait for it, retired judicial office holders who are encouraged to refer to it so as to avoid any activity that may tarnish the reputation of the judiciary. I’ve read it. 26 pages. Gender-specific pronouns, removed. Some of my old columns, removed.

What’s the point of getting in a gallery of prints to stick up on the wall and a cornucopia of canapés when you cannot rely on the services of a breathing judge in attendance? Office-holders are told

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll