header-logo header-logo

26 November 2021 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7958 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 26 November 2021

Rent arrears go backwards; Barder visits Covid; PI PAP PERFECTED; Enforcement stays; Law at Night; Memos with threats

BUSINESS RENTALS GO RETRO

The government has issued a new code of practice for commercial property relationships following the pandemic replacing the June 2020 version as updated. Its Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Bill, which has received a first reading in the Commons, would lead to an arbitration process for parties failing to crack their dispute within the code as from 25 March 2022. Controversially, it is crazy on retrospection. Given that it has nothing to do with sleaze, you may well calculate that it will make it to the statute book. That being so, you could advise your business landlord clients to save on court fees. There will be a temporary moratorium on enforcement of business rent arrears which have accrued over the period 21 March 2020 to, generally, 18 July 2021 in England and 7 August 2021 in Wales because the tenancy was ‘adversely affected by coronavirus’. A debt claim for the arrears

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll