header-logo header-logo

28 February 2025 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way , CPR
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 28 February 2025

Latest CPR changes; Montreal Convention limits up; right to Manage reforms; mediation vouchers; your President guides x 3.

REFRESHING THE CPR

I am worried. Are members of the Civil Procedure Rule Committee receiving sufficient sustenance? According to its recently published annual report for 2023–24, the Ministry of Justice provides them with refreshments when meetings are held in person but in lieu of them making a subsistence claim. There were seven in-person meetings for the report year and the cost of refreshments came to £824, which averaged out at around £118 a meeting. That would allow, say, £9 per head. However, my suspicion is that non-member attendees, principally civil servants, may also have been tucking in, which would reduce the allowance to £4 per head. If I can get into the open meeting scheduled for May 2025, I will report back on who is scoffing what. After all, this is the age of transparency, and information on judicial eating habits should be available to the public. Too much processed food could lead

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll