header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 31 July 2020

29 July 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail
Court bargains on offer; COVID lesson; Online for FR consents

Naughty MoJ

They’ve done it again. Two years ago the MoJ announced it had been overcharging on a series of court fees and would be operating a refund scheme which is still open (see ‘Civil way‘, 168 NLJ 7802, p19). It has now reviewed fees charged for 2018/19 against actual cost and concluded that there has been more overcharging. The good news is that loadsafees are being reduced without the need to wear a mask as from next Monday 3 August 2020—so hold the post—by the Courts Fees (Miscellaneous Amendments) Order 2020 (SI 2020/720). The bad news is that there will not be another refund scheme, on the shaky grounds that the MoJ has taken prompt action to reduce for the future and that the overcharged fees were set on the basis of a predictive estimate of what the cost would be which is claimed to have been reasonable. The MoJ says it is continuing to make improvements

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll