header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 31 July 2020

29 July 2020 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7897 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Civil way
printer mail-detail
Court bargains on offer; COVID lesson; Online for FR consents

Naughty MoJ

They’ve done it again. Two years ago the MoJ announced it had been overcharging on a series of court fees and would be operating a refund scheme which is still open (see ‘Civil way‘, 168 NLJ 7802, p19). It has now reviewed fees charged for 2018/19 against actual cost and concluded that there has been more overcharging. The good news is that loadsafees are being reduced without the need to wear a mask as from next Monday 3 August 2020—so hold the post—by the Courts Fees (Miscellaneous Amendments) Order 2020 (SI 2020/720). The bad news is that there will not be another refund scheme, on the shaky grounds that the MoJ has taken prompt action to reduce for the future and that the overcharged fees were set on the basis of a predictive estimate of what the cost would be which is claimed to have been reasonable. The MoJ says it is continuing to make improvements

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll