header-logo header-logo

20 May 2011 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7466 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 20 May 2011

It took the trial judge in Bond v Dunster Properties Ltd and others [2011] EWCA Civ 455, [2011] All ER (D) 248 (Apr)...

22 MONTHS LATER

It took the trial judge in Bond v Dunster Properties Ltd and others [2011] EWCA Civ 455, [2011] All ER (D) 248 (Apr), 22 months to deliver his judgment after the conclusion of the hearing of a series of preliminary issues. Judge Havelock-Allan QC, who had been sitting in the Bristol Mercantile Court, unsurprisingly received plenty of stick for the delay from the Court of Appeal.

It was pointed out that the usual period for delivery of judgment was three months (circuit and district judges and recorders are usually expected to deliver within three months of the hearing in civil cases and two months in family cases with a referral to the senior presiding judge or the President in default) and the Master of the Rolls Lord Neuberger said he would be investigating whether more robust and effective procedures were needed in some quarters

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll