header-logo header-logo

Civil way: 28 June 2013

27 June 2013
Issue: 7566 / Categories: Features , Civil way
printer mail-detail

Court fees & rent deposits grab the headlines

IN HARMONY

The good news: it could have been worse. The bad news: litigants are clobbered with a myriad of court fee increases operative on 1 July 2013 under the terrible trio—the Civil Proceedings (Amendment No 2) Order 2013 (SI 2013/1410), the Family Proceedings Fees (Amendment) Order 2013 (SI 2013/1407) and the Magistrates’ Courts Fees (Amendment) Order 2013 (SI 2013/1409). So if you want to escape the increases, you’ve still got a few hours left unless you are reading this on the tram home.  

Civil fees stay as they are except that there is a merger of two detailed assessment fees. The fee on requesting a legal aid only detailed assessment is united with the fee for approval of the costs certificate resulting in a total of sum payable of £195 on requesting the assessment as against the current £145 and £50 respectively. Merger raises an uglier head in family business as the majority of High Court, county court and magistrates’ courts’ family fees are hiked

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll