header-logo header-logo

12 September 2013 / Stephen Gold
Issue: 7575 / Categories: Features , Civil way , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Civil way: 13 September 2013

Standing charge falls over...

Bus charge stop

West Midlands Travel Ltd operated 228 buses which were involved in about 3000 road traffic accidents a year of which around one-half were the fault of third parties. A lot of buses, a lot of accidents and a lot of claims. Like most bus operators, West Midlands maintained a certain amount of spare capacity to allow for accidents, maintenance, and other contingencies but all the buses in its fleet were used on a rotating basis. Because not all the fleet was on the road at any given time, the company was unable to recover loss of profit from a tortfeaser. Instead, it sought to recover a standing charge by way of general damages for loss of use and used a formula produced by the Confederation of Passenger Transport which, broadly speaking, ascribed to each bus a proportion of the total overheads incurred in operating the whole fleet. It was called a standing charge.

The standing charge concept, for public service vehicles at least, is no

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll