header-logo header-logo

CJC concerned over fee remission

23 May 2013
Issue: 7561 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Proposals will “significantly reduce” income thresholds for couples

The Civil Justice Council (CJC) has expressed concern about court fee remission proposals, which would “significantly reduce” income thresholds for couples.

Last month, the government published a consultation on proposals to introduce a two-stage fee remission system across the courts and tribunals. Under this system, claimants’ disposable capital and income would be assessed to see whether they should receive remission on court and tribunal fees.

In its response to the consultation this week, however, the CJC said the disposable capital test would have “an adverse equality impact on older people” who may rely on capital for retirement income. The thresholds for both gross monthly income and disposable capital were too low, and it was “disproportionate” to expect someone to invest half their disposable capital “simply on the fee to bring a claim”.

However, the CJC which is chaired by the Master of the Rolls, supported the introduction of a single fee remission system as it would lead to a “consistent approach” across all jurisdictions.

Issue: 7561 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll