header-logo header-logo

CJC funding move

29 July 2010
Issue: 7428 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Civil Justice Council (CJC) has launched revised proposals for regulating third party litigation funding

Its consultation paper, published last week, A Self-Regulatory Code for Third Party Funding, takes account of Jackson LJ’s recommendations, which were included in his review of civil litigation costs.

Jackson LJ recommended a voluntary code for all litigation funders with effective capital adequacy requirements and restrictions on funders’ ability to withdraw support for ongoing litigation.

He recommended revisiting the prospect of statutory regulation when the third party funding market expands, and ensuring that funders be potentially liable for the full amount of adverse costs, subject to the discretion of the judge.

The CJC code has been revised to include these recommendations.
Third party litigation funding is a small but emerging industry—according to the CJC, it has so far been used in no more than a hundred cases in England and Wales.

The CJC says the code and the association will help ensure that “the nascent litigation funding industry develops in a fair and responsible way, affording protection for consumers who wish to contract services in this market to fund their litigation”.

The CJC anticipates that the considerable majority, if not all customers in the funding market are “informed consumers” and will “have ready access to professional legal and financial advice”.

Responses to the six-week consultation are due in by Friday 3 September 2010.
 

Issue: 7428 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll