header-logo header-logo

29 April 2026
Issue: 8159 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs , ADR
printer mail-detail

CJC takes hammer to rules on solicitors’ costs

Client complaints about ‘more modest bills’ of £50,000 or less would be handled by the Legal Ombudsman rather than the courts, under Civil Justice Council (CJC) proposals

Disputes over larger bills, on the other hand, would be required to try alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes before moving to the courts.

The CJC, in a consultation issued last week on reforming solicitors’ costs in Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974, proposes replacing current legislation governing solicitors’ costs, including the requirement that the client give ‘informed consent’. Instead, there would be a ‘readily understood’ statutory code featuring the overarching principle that solicitors’ charges be ‘fair and reasonable’. This test would be ‘an objective one, applicable to the terms of the engagement and the quantum of the charges, rather than the manner of achieving the agreement’.

The CJC also recommends scrapping the current distinction between contentious and non-contentious business as it ‘serves no useful purpose and on the contrary promotes uncertainty and inefficiency’.

David Bailey-Vella, chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers, said: ‘This is an exciting moment for the costs market.

‘We are pleased to see recommendations that will sweep away many of the outdated formalities around bills that serve only to prolong disputes unnecessarily. In principle, shifting responsibility for smaller bills to the Legal Ombudsman is attractive if it makes their resolution quicker and cheaper. But the current state of the Ombudsman, which has been open about the need for radical reform in the face of a fast-growing caseload and ever-longer waits for complainants, raises questions about how practical this is, at least for the foreseeable future.

‘We support the greater use of ADR, but we need solicitors to buy in too. Overall, there is much to like in this consultation. But what it points to is the need for a culture change as much as a rule change if we are to deliver a regime that works in the interests of all.’

Law Society vice president Brett Dixon said: ‘Rules around solicitors’ costs are unnecessarily complicated and it is positive that the CJC are considering reform.’

The consultation closes on 16 July.

Issue: 8159 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs , ADR
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll