header-logo header-logo

The claim game

23 July 2009 / David Hadfield , Sara Partington
Issue: 7379 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Fraudulent conduct is no bar to a genuine claim, say David Hadfield & Sara Partington

The Court of Appeal has recently revisited the law and given valuable  clarification relating to the impact of fraudulent claims by third parties on any genuine underlying claim which they may themselves have (see Anita Shah v Wasim Ul-Haq & Others ([2009] EWCA Civ 542, [2009] All ER (D) 71 (Jun)). Insurers in particular are all too familiar with fraudulent claims arising out road traffic accidents or to an extent in other personal injury claims.

It has become so common that one county court judge was moved to observe: “Unhappily such fraudulent claims are now legion. They occupy the court time of District Judges and Circuit Judges…literally week in and week out. My own judicial experience reflects, I have no doubt, that of many of my brethren throughout the country.

Just about every variant of a fraudulent claim comes before the court, including deliberately staged collisions, damage caused to vehicles which have never been in collision at all,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll