header-logo header-logo

20 October 2011
Issue: 7486 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Claim lies lead to contempt of court

Exaggerated personal injury tales land victim's family in trouble

Two witnesses who lied about the extent of a claimant’s injuries in a £1.5m personal injury claim against a bus company have been found guilty of contempt of court.

Thereza Daoud launched a claim for compensation against Brighton and Hove Bus Company after she was hit by a bus 2005. Subsequent investigation—including video footage of the claimant dancing at her daughter’s wedding, shopping and going to a local salon—revealed she had exaggerated her injuries.

In Brighton & Hove Bus and Coach Co v Brooks and Ors [2011] EWHC 2504 (Admin),  Mrs Daoud’s husband and daughter were found to have presented a deliberately false picture to medical experts and to be in contempt of court.

Mark Whittaker, insurance partner at DWF, that represented Brighton and Hove, says: “It is an extremely rare case because it is one of the few occasions where contempt of court proceedings have been pursued in a civil court and also as the case only related to the witnesses involved and not to the claimant herself.”
 

Issue: 7486 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll