header-logo header-logo

25 January 2016
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Clampdown on claims against veterans

The prime minister has ordered ministers on the UK’s national security council to draw up options to deter law firms pursuing claims against Iraq war veterans.

These could include the requirement that legal aid claimants have lived in the UK for 12 months, or restrictions on "no win no fee" agreements. David Cameron said last week that it was “clear there is now an industry trying to profit from spurious claims lodged against our brave servicemen and women who fought in Iraq”.

Claims against the Ministry of Defence (MoD) on behalf of Iraqi nationals have been brought by Leigh Day solicitors and Public Interest Lawyers (PIL), resulting in the £31m Al-Sweady inquiry into whether British soldiers tortured and murdered detainees near Basra in 2004. The claims folded after Leigh Day failed to disclose a document that showed some of the claimants were members of the rebel Mahdi army. The inquiry concluded that the allegations of torture and murder were “deliberate lies, reckless speculation and ingrained hostility”.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has now referred Leigh Day to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal over its failure to disclose the document to the inquiry. Leigh Day said it would “contest those allegations vigorously”.

In a statement on its website, Leigh Day says: “Over the last twelve years many cases of abuse made against the MoD during the course of the occupation of Iraq have come to light and been accepted by the government. In addition, the government has paid compensation for over 300 other cases relating to abuse and unlawful detention of Iraqis.”

In a statement, PIL says: “There is no evidential basis of there being ‘spurious claims’ and the prime minister’s comments are wholly unfounded."

The SRA will not refer Public Interest Lawyers to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. 

Issue: 7684 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll