header-logo header-logo

Clampdown on claims against veterans

25 January 2016
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The prime minister has ordered ministers on the UK’s national security council to draw up options to deter law firms pursuing claims against Iraq war veterans.

These could include the requirement that legal aid claimants have lived in the UK for 12 months, or restrictions on "no win no fee" agreements. David Cameron said last week that it was “clear there is now an industry trying to profit from spurious claims lodged against our brave servicemen and women who fought in Iraq”.

Claims against the Ministry of Defence (MoD) on behalf of Iraqi nationals have been brought by Leigh Day solicitors and Public Interest Lawyers (PIL), resulting in the £31m Al-Sweady inquiry into whether British soldiers tortured and murdered detainees near Basra in 2004. The claims folded after Leigh Day failed to disclose a document that showed some of the claimants were members of the rebel Mahdi army. The inquiry concluded that the allegations of torture and murder were “deliberate lies, reckless speculation and ingrained hostility”.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has now referred Leigh Day to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal over its failure to disclose the document to the inquiry. Leigh Day said it would “contest those allegations vigorously”.

In a statement on its website, Leigh Day says: “Over the last twelve years many cases of abuse made against the MoD during the course of the occupation of Iraq have come to light and been accepted by the government. In addition, the government has paid compensation for over 300 other cases relating to abuse and unlawful detention of Iraqis.”

In a statement, PIL says: “There is no evidential basis of there being ‘spurious claims’ and the prime minister’s comments are wholly unfounded."

The SRA will not refer Public Interest Lawyers to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. 

Issue: 7684 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll