header-logo header-logo

Clampdown on claims against veterans

25 January 2016
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The prime minister has ordered ministers on the UK’s national security council to draw up options to deter law firms pursuing claims against Iraq war veterans.

These could include the requirement that legal aid claimants have lived in the UK for 12 months, or restrictions on "no win no fee" agreements. David Cameron said last week that it was “clear there is now an industry trying to profit from spurious claims lodged against our brave servicemen and women who fought in Iraq”.

Claims against the Ministry of Defence (MoD) on behalf of Iraqi nationals have been brought by Leigh Day solicitors and Public Interest Lawyers (PIL), resulting in the £31m Al-Sweady inquiry into whether British soldiers tortured and murdered detainees near Basra in 2004. The claims folded after Leigh Day failed to disclose a document that showed some of the claimants were members of the rebel Mahdi army. The inquiry concluded that the allegations of torture and murder were “deliberate lies, reckless speculation and ingrained hostility”.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has now referred Leigh Day to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal over its failure to disclose the document to the inquiry. Leigh Day said it would “contest those allegations vigorously”.

In a statement on its website, Leigh Day says: “Over the last twelve years many cases of abuse made against the MoD during the course of the occupation of Iraq have come to light and been accepted by the government. In addition, the government has paid compensation for over 300 other cases relating to abuse and unlawful detention of Iraqis.”

In a statement, PIL says: “There is no evidential basis of there being ‘spurious claims’ and the prime minister’s comments are wholly unfounded."

The SRA will not refer Public Interest Lawyers to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal. 

Issue: 7684 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll