header-logo header-logo

23 September 2019 / Paul Hewitt , Sarah Aughwane
Issue: 7857 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Clarification on standstill agreements

A claimant relying on a standstill agreement in 1975 Act claims does take a risk, but one that will almost certainly be worth taking in future, as Paul Hewitt & Sarah Aughwane explain

Under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (the '1975 Act'), claims started more than six months after the grant of probate need the court's permission to proceed.

That is sometimes referred to as a 'limitation period'. But it is a different creature. With a 1975 Act claim, the court always retains discretion as to whether or not to permit a claim to proceed out of time.

Nevertheless, it is common practice among solicitors dealing with 1975 Act claims to borrow the concept of standstill agreements from limitation cases.

That practice has been closely scrutinised, and now clearly approved by the Court of Appeal in Cowan v Foreman [2019] EWCA Civ 1336, [2019] All ER (D) 31 (Aug).

Facts

Michael Cowan, a businessman credited with bringing the black bin liner to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll