header-logo header-logo

19 February 2014
Issue: 7595 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Clarity on hyperlink copyright clash

Landmark European ruling in Svensson brings relief for IP lawyers

Intellectual property lawyers have breathed a sigh of relief following a European ruling that sharing hypertext links does not automatically infringe copyright.

In Svensson v Retriever Sverige C-466/12 on the interpretation of Art 3(1) of the Copyright Directive, the European Court of Justice clarified that sharing clickable links with third parties is not an infringement, as long as they do not circumvent paywalls or make the linked information available to a “new” public.

The case, which arose from a copyright dispute in Sweden between a newspaper and a website, concerned whether a hyperlink was “an act of communication to the public”, thereby falling within the copyright holder’s exclusive right and requiring their permission.

The court held that hyperlinks are indeed “an act of communication” but that the communication must be to a “new” public for liability to arise—one that was not the intended audience of the copyright holders at the time of the initial posting.

Tom Ohta, associate, Bristows, says the ruling that linking to “freely accessible” content would not infringe reflects a sensible approach; to have found otherwise could have had a “chilling” effect on the internet.

He adds: “What is significant is the clarification that a hyperlink can fall within the scope of the exclusive right. However, it is not yet clear how this ruling will apply to links to infringing content which are copied and passed on. Two pending judgments on linking and framing are expected later this year, which will hopefully give further clarity on this issue.”

Joshy Thomas, LexisPSL specialist in IP, says: “Content rich businesses where linking is key will be considering whether they now need the protection of more restrictive paywalls.  

“They may also consider whether there are choices to be made about, in certain limited cases, periodically disrupting access to make things more difficult for linkers, or controlling access through protection software. Those who are keen to monetise linking, including the use of embedded links to third party content, will be heartened by the decision.”

Susan Hall, IP specialist at Clarke Willmott, says: “This is a landmark decision and sets a clear protocol for the sharing of hyperlinks once and for all.”

 

Issue: 7595 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll