header-logo header-logo

A clash of interests?

27 January 2012 / Susan Brown
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Susan Brown highlights the potential conflicts of interest surrounding ABSs, insurers & motor claims

We are told that insurers are keen to use alternative business structures (ABSs) as vehicles through which they can take control of the whole claims process, from first notification of loss to settlement.

Admiral, for example, has been reported as considering branching into the legal sector to plug the hole that will be created when they can no longer generate referral fee income by referring motor accident victims to law firms. They are unlikely to be the only insurer thinking along the lines that an ABS is an attractive prospect, with the insurer part of the business referring claims to the legal/claims handling part of it, without formal exchange of referral fees, but on the basis that the legal costs recovered when the claim is settled are additional income generated for the business.

Law firms are also exploring the business opportunities offered by setting up ABS as “one-stop shops” for dealing with motor claims. For example, the Parabis

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll