header-logo header-logo

27 January 2012 / Susan Brown
Issue: 7498 / Categories: Features , Professional negligence , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

A clash of interests?

Susan Brown highlights the potential conflicts of interest surrounding ABSs, insurers & motor claims

We are told that insurers are keen to use alternative business structures (ABSs) as vehicles through which they can take control of the whole claims process, from first notification of loss to settlement.

Admiral, for example, has been reported as considering branching into the legal sector to plug the hole that will be created when they can no longer generate referral fee income by referring motor accident victims to law firms. They are unlikely to be the only insurer thinking along the lines that an ABS is an attractive prospect, with the insurer part of the business referring claims to the legal/claims handling part of it, without formal exchange of referral fees, but on the basis that the legal costs recovered when the claim is settled are additional income generated for the business.

Law firms are also exploring the business opportunities offered by setting up ABS as “one-stop shops” for dealing with motor claims. For example, the Parabis

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll