header-logo header-logo

31 January 2014 / Murray Heining
Issue: 7592 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

A class act

web_heining

Murray Heining provides an overview of the new qualification for costs lawyers

The changing face of civil litigation is having a corresponding effect on the role of costs lawyers.

Our position, which has already been enhanced in recent years by becoming a properly regulated profession standing side-by-side with solicitors, barristers and others, has arguably become more important with the new focus on prospective budgeting by parties to litigation, rather than after-the-event assessments.

Getting it right

This means solicitors will need to get it right from the start of their case, as judges have warned that it will usually be extremely difficult to persuade them to revise a budget that contains mistakes.

Speaking at the Association of Costs Lawyers’ (ACL) annual conference last year, Mr Justice Ramsey—the judge in charge of Jackson implementation—said he saw us playing a key role in future. He said: “The expertise of people in this room is to say, ‘We’ve seen what happens at the end of litigation and now we’re going to apply that to the beginning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll