header-logo header-logo

A class act

31 January 2014 / Murray Heining
Issue: 7592 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail
web_heining

Murray Heining provides an overview of the new qualification for costs lawyers

The changing face of civil litigation is having a corresponding effect on the role of costs lawyers.

Our position, which has already been enhanced in recent years by becoming a properly regulated profession standing side-by-side with solicitors, barristers and others, has arguably become more important with the new focus on prospective budgeting by parties to litigation, rather than after-the-event assessments.

Getting it right

This means solicitors will need to get it right from the start of their case, as judges have warned that it will usually be extremely difficult to persuade them to revise a budget that contains mistakes.

Speaking at the Association of Costs Lawyers’ (ACL) annual conference last year, Mr Justice Ramsey—the judge in charge of Jackson implementation—said he saw us playing a key role in future. He said: “The expertise of people in this room is to say, ‘We’ve seen what happens at the end of litigation and now we’re going to apply that to the beginning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll