header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007 / David Greene
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

Class action

Is the EU ready to adopt US-style class actions? David Greene thinks not

The European Commissioner for Consumer Protection, Meglena Kuneva, has recently published her programme for the coming year which includes the introduction of class actions to improve consumers’ access to courts throughout the EU. This follows proposals from the European Commissioner for Competition, Neelie Kos, that US-style class actions should be introduced throughout the EU for the purpose of encouraging private enforcement of competition legislation in the courts.

Commissioner Kuneva has to a large extent adopted the proposals in the Competition Commissioner’s green paper, Damages, Action for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules, which spelt out the adoption of US-style class actions in some detail. The green paper followed an earlier consultation paper, Study on the Conditions of Claims for Damages in case of Infringement of EC Competition Rules (2004), which reviewed systems for private redress in competition law throughout the EU and highlighted recognised gaps in the regulatory regime.

The European Commission and our own Office of Fair Trading have made it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll