header-logo header-logo

14 June 2007 / David Greene
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

Class action

Is the EU ready to adopt US-style class actions? David Greene thinks not

The European Commissioner for Consumer Protection, Meglena Kuneva, has recently published her programme for the coming year which includes the introduction of class actions to improve consumers’ access to courts throughout the EU. This follows proposals from the European Commissioner for Competition, Neelie Kos, that US-style class actions should be introduced throughout the EU for the purpose of encouraging private enforcement of competition legislation in the courts.

Commissioner Kuneva has to a large extent adopted the proposals in the Competition Commissioner’s green paper, Damages, Action for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules, which spelt out the adoption of US-style class actions in some detail. The green paper followed an earlier consultation paper, Study on the Conditions of Claims for Damages in case of Infringement of EC Competition Rules (2004), which reviewed systems for private redress in competition law throughout the EU and highlighted recognised gaps in the regulatory regime.

The European Commission and our own Office of Fair Trading have made it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll