header-logo header-logo

16 October 2008 / Patrick Reeve
Issue: 7341 / Categories: Features , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Clean bill of health

The LSC is determined to protect vulnerable clients, says Patrick Reeve

Jon Robins’s article, “Heading for breakdown…” (NLJ, 26 September, p 1,311) makes some misleading comments about the current provision of publicly funded mental health legal services.

The Legal Services Commission (LSC) is committed to helping those with mental health problems access legal advice, particularly advice and representation before the Mental Health Review Tribunal (MHRT). There is, for example, no financial eligibility test for work carried out in assisting people applying to the tribunal.

The main concern raised in the article was that the mental health standard fee scheme—implemented in January of this year—is causing providers to withdraw from mental health work, and leaving clients unable to access legal services. This was something that a few of our providers have raised with us, as the author of the article notes. We are aware of these concerns, and I would like to assure him that it is a matter that we are taking very seriously. Access to services for these vulnerable clients is a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll