header-logo header-logo

17 July 2008 / Emma Kaye
Issue: 7330 / Categories: Features , In-House , Profession
printer mail-detail

The client crunch

Emma Kaye reports on how uncertain market conditions are intensifying pressure on law firms

Clients are sharpening their focus on the procurement and management of outside counsel. They are increasingly sophisticated, discriminating and demanding of their law firms and, in times of economic uncertainty, we can expect this pressure to intensify.

Clients have a clear sense of the strategic value of a matter and what they, therefore, expect of the law firms they instruct. Buying and management decisions will be dependent on how matters are categorised (high, mid and low value) and who is making the purchasing decision (the board, a specialist or the general counsel).

Clients' expectations of their lawyers for matters of critical business importance (high value matters) will be rather different to expectations for the type of work which clients see as more routine. For the business critical work, clients are looking for firms that can deliver thought leadership, demonstrable experience/reputation, a business solutions approach, excellent relationship management and high standards of service and support. By contrast, at the other

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll