header-logo header-logo

In-House

Subscribe

Jeopardy or opportunity?

What is the future for funding litigation when state aid is unavailable?

Essential skills for client development

Time for review or revolution?

Merit, diversity & transparency to transform boardrooms

Law firms need to reassess their working methods to meet the expectations of in-house counsel, according to new research.

In-house counsel are under pressure to protect against e-disclosure slip-ups, says Deborah Blaxell

Robert Jones & John Doherty explain why it’s time to put your(ESI) house in order

Jo Lloyd-Davies gives an overview of the intellectual property issues involved in finding new suppliers

NLJ newscast: company regulation & directors duties

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll