header-logo header-logo

06 January 2010
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Features , In-House , Profession , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

The rightful owners

Jo Lloyd-Davies gives an overview of the intellectual property issues involved in finding new suppliers

Manufacturers often buy components from third parties. In economically healthier times, order books were full and outsourcing allowed manufacturers to free space within their factories.

As the manufacturing industry matured, competition within it increased and costs could be saved by buying from suppliers that served many companies within the same sector.

With economic health came complacency. Forecasted high volumes demanded that deals were done quickly; supplier drawings were e-mailed to manufacturers for approval, often without a supporting non-disclosure agreement or supply agreement in place.

Manufacturers are now looking to buy components from cheaper sources or to bring their manufacture in-house. Times are gloomier and such moves are desirable both to save costs and to reduce the potential impact of supplier insolvency.

Buying teams must cut costs but are often unfamiliar with the intellectual property issues involved. This is unsurprising given the myriad registered and unregistered rights which can co-exist.

Registered rights

If the supplier owns a patent or registered

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll