header-logo header-logo

The rightful owners

06 January 2010
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Features , In-House , Profession , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Jo Lloyd-Davies gives an overview of the intellectual property issues involved in finding new suppliers

Manufacturers often buy components from third parties. In economically healthier times, order books were full and outsourcing allowed manufacturers to free space within their factories.

As the manufacturing industry matured, competition within it increased and costs could be saved by buying from suppliers that served many companies within the same sector.

With economic health came complacency. Forecasted high volumes demanded that deals were done quickly; supplier drawings were e-mailed to manufacturers for approval, often without a supporting non-disclosure agreement or supply agreement in place.

Manufacturers are now looking to buy components from cheaper sources or to bring their manufacture in-house. Times are gloomier and such moves are desirable both to save costs and to reduce the potential impact of supplier insolvency.

Buying teams must cut costs but are often unfamiliar with the intellectual property issues involved. This is unsurprising given the myriad registered and unregistered rights which can co-exist.

Registered rights

If the supplier owns a patent or registered

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll